July 13, 2020. The Atlanta Track Club and the Garden State Track Club agreed upon a set of three virtual
competitions, a 5K in early May, followed by a 10K in June and winding up with
a 1 Mile Run in late June/early July. The winning team gets 10 points, and the
2nd place team 9 points, in each of the three races to determine the
Overall Series winner.
They provided multiple Virtual
awards, involving Men's 40's, and Men's 50's (for all 3 races), and Men's 60's & Women's 40's (Race #1 only). All virtual runs were to take
place during a time-window that allowed runners two weekends and the week
between. The competition had several levels. There was team-to-team competition
within each age division, and there was an Overall Club competition across all
of the team competitions. They used road race scoring in that they added up
times. Unlike the USATF Masters Championship,s where only the top 3 score, they
scored as many as possible in each team/division competition, limiting the
number to that of the team with fewer entrants. If ATC entered 7 and GSTC 6,
then 6 were scored. They also reported the number of finishers scored by road (top 3 runners) and by
cross country (top 5 runners) . They always added up
times (road rules) rather than add up places (cross country rules). The team with the lower cumulative time, won the race and scored 10 points. The other team was awarded 9 points.
Recall that the earlier two races were split.
Race 1-5K ATC had a 9:22:38 winning total; GSTC score summed to 9:49:35. ATC took the series lead, 10-9.
Race 2-10K . GSTC took the win by a wide margin. GSTC 5:54:13 over ATC 6:19:24.
Race 2-10K . GSTC took the win by a wide margin. GSTC 5:54:13 over ATC 6:19:24.
With the 10K results, GSTC pulled even with ATC in the Overall Series
Club Competition at 19 points each.The Club that wins the Mile takes the
series.
Race 3-1 Mile Atlanta’s M60+ and W40+ teams did not compete; they were engaged in other competitions or enterprises. There were great efforts from the 40’s and 50’s teams with the contest again very close.
TOP-3 SCORING
M40+ GSTC’s Chuck Schneekloth, who won the USATF Masters Road Mile competition in Flint last year, recorded the fastest time by far, 4:32.
But ATC countered with Brent Fields and Brian Sydow, who finished 3rd at Flint, clocking almost identical 4:50 and 4:51 times.
But GSTC’s Dave Ferrugia and Shawn Williams were not far back at 4:52.6 and 4:53.4.
Tommy Carroll finished off the ATC scoring at 4:53. With the exception of Schneekloth, who scorched one, the rest of the field was amazingly close. Second through 6th separated by just 3 seconds! GSTC takes M40+ honors 14:17 to 14:34!
M50+ ATC’s David Matherne posted the top time at 4:58. But GSTC’s Joe Hegge, Todd Wiley, and Mark Zamek were only a tick behind, clocking almost identical times at 4:59.6, 5:00, and 5:00.6. Jeff Haertel and Mike Strickland struck next for ATC with 5:06 and 5:08.
GSTC takes this division in a close one, 15:00 to 15:10.
M40+ GSTC’s Chuck Schneekloth, who won the USATF Masters Road Mile competition in Flint last year, recorded the fastest time by far, 4:32.
Chuck Schneekloth shares the surprise at his amazing 4:32.4 Virtual Mile! Photo courtesy of GSTC |
But ATC countered with Brent Fields and Brian Sydow, who finished 3rd at Flint, clocking almost identical 4:50 and 4:51 times.
Brian Sydow running his Virtual 5K for the May competition Photo courtesy of ATC |
But GSTC’s Dave Ferrugia and Shawn Williams were not far back at 4:52.6 and 4:53.4.
Shawn Williams Navy t-shirt and Robert Riordan 2nd from right and their 'Cheer Crew' Photo courtesy of GSTC |
Tommy Carroll finished off the ATC scoring at 4:53. With the exception of Schneekloth, who scorched one, the rest of the field was amazingly close. Second through 6th separated by just 3 seconds! GSTC takes M40+ honors 14:17 to 14:34!
M50+ ATC’s David Matherne posted the top time at 4:58. But GSTC’s Joe Hegge, Todd Wiley, and Mark Zamek were only a tick behind, clocking almost identical times at 4:59.6, 5:00, and 5:00.6. Jeff Haertel and Mike Strickland struck next for ATC with 5:06 and 5:08.
GSTC takes this division in a close one, 15:00 to 15:10.
TOP-5 SCORING
M40+ GSTC adds in the times of #4 runner Chris Sallade, 4:57,
and #5 Jason Timochko, 4:59.68.
ATC picks up #4, Jack Westrick, 5:02, and either Steve Bell or Fred Dolan, both of whom ran 5:04. This enlarges the margin to 27 seconds, GSTC 24:13 to ATC 24:40.
M50+ ATC adds #4, Chip Hawkins 5:16,
and #5, Dave Lee, 5:30, while John Hogan
and Stephen Katz contribute 5:11 and 5:41 for Garden State. The margin narrows but GSTC takes the division by 4 seconds, at 25:52 to 25:56.
M40+ GSTC adds in the times of #4 runner Chris Sallade, 4:57,
Chris Sallade and Son after Dad's successful 4:57 Mile Photo courtesy of GSTC |
and #5 Jason Timochko, 4:59.68.
And they are (socially distancing) off! Jason Timochko and Dan Reiser Photo courtesy of GSTC |
ATC picks up #4, Jack Westrick, 5:02, and either Steve Bell or Fred Dolan, both of whom ran 5:04. This enlarges the margin to 27 seconds, GSTC 24:13 to ATC 24:40.
M50+ ATC adds #4, Chip Hawkins 5:16,
Chip Hawkins's enthusiastic 5K Virtual Run in May Photo courtesy of GSTC |
and #5, Dave Lee, 5:30, while John Hogan
John Hogan at the track after clocking a 5:11 Mile. Photo courtesy of GSTC |
and Stephen Katz contribute 5:11 and 5:41 for Garden State. The margin narrows but GSTC takes the division by 4 seconds, at 25:52 to 25:56.
AGE-GRADING
GSTC’s Mark Zamek 57 5:00.65 took his second age-grading title in the series at 89.70%.
Mark Zamek cruising to a 5:00.65, despite a nagging achilles tendon, in the 85 degree heat that he loves! Photo courtesy of GSTC |
Todd Wiley 50 5:00 84.83 Tommy Carroll 47 4:53 84.81 Brian Sydow 46 4:51 4:51 John Hogan 54 5:11.37 84.45 Mike Strickland 52 5:08 83.98 Chris Sallade 47 4:57 83.67 Jack Westrick 49 5:02 83.60% Steve Bell 48 5:04 82.38 Greg Oshust 58 5:32 81.93 Fred Dolan 47 5:04 81.74 Shawn Williams 42 4:53.4 81.49 Lester Dragstedt 57 5:31 81.48
Lester Dragstedt running his Virtual 5K in May Photo courtesy of GSTC |
Steven Segaloff 49 5:11 81.18
Steven Segaloff getting it done on the track! Photo courtesy of GSTC |
Jason Timochko 43 4:59.68 80.94
Jason Timochko illustrating how not to recover from your sub-5-minute Virtual Mile Photo courtesy of GSTC |
Chip Hawkins 50 5:16 80.53
Even though there was no outside competition, GSTC's W40+ squad ran their Virtual Mile Runs. Elena Rozhko 47 ran a swift 5:21 for an 89.71% age grade.
Elena Rozhko races to a 5:21 Virtual Mile Photo courtesy of GSTC |
The performance of Kim Aspholm 50 6:10 81.10 was also notable.
OVERALL CLUB SCORING
M40+ Each team had at least 8 M40+ runners. ATC adds to its M40+ top-5 score the times of #’s 6-8, Fred Dolan, Kevin Gibson, at 5:04 and 5:06, and either Chris Weiss or Aaron Totten-Lancaster, both of whom ran 5:09. That gets ATC’s 40+ up from 24:40 to 39:59. GSTC adds the times of their 6-7-8, Robert Riordan, Steven Segaloff, and Trevor Emmitt at 5:09, 5:11, and 5:16. GSTC’s 40+ total rises from 24:13 to 39:50. Now just 9 seconds separates the teams!
M50+ With 50+ only the top 5 are scored, leaving ATC at 25:56 and GSTC at 25:52.
ATC’s combined 40+ and 50+ scores add to 1:05:55, while GSTC’s combine to 1:05:42. GSTC takes the 1 Mile contest by a mere 13 seconds over 13 competitors each, an average margin of a single second.
M40+ Each team had at least 8 M40+ runners. ATC adds to its M40+ top-5 score the times of #’s 6-8, Fred Dolan, Kevin Gibson, at 5:04 and 5:06, and either Chris Weiss or Aaron Totten-Lancaster, both of whom ran 5:09. That gets ATC’s 40+ up from 24:40 to 39:59. GSTC adds the times of their 6-7-8, Robert Riordan, Steven Segaloff, and Trevor Emmitt at 5:09, 5:11, and 5:16. GSTC’s 40+ total rises from 24:13 to 39:50. Now just 9 seconds separates the teams!
M50+ With 50+ only the top 5 are scored, leaving ATC at 25:56 and GSTC at 25:52.
ATC’s combined 40+ and 50+ scores add to 1:05:55, while GSTC’s combine to 1:05:42. GSTC takes the 1 Mile contest by a mere 13 seconds over 13 competitors each, an average margin of a single second.
With GSTC taking the 1 Mile Virtual title, that gives them
29 points in the Race Series to 28 for Atlanta!
It is a credit to both clubs that they mounted the
competition and saw it through over several weeks and three different distances.
The contest was close at every stage, adding to the suspense. I am sure it fired up both teams, and may have inspired a few more teams to think about virtual competition during this covid-no-races/no-championships period.
Note: Based on times, scores, and age grade percentages as
reported by the Race Organizer, GSTC’s Mark Zamek, to Brian Sydow, ATC
Coordinator, with your author copied.
What is up next?
The Boulder Road Runners are
hosting a three-holiday virtual 60+ competition this summer over the Memorial
Day, Independence Day and Labor Day weekends. There are at least seven
different clubs from coast-to-coast participating. The Independence Day week competition is done and will be the next race recapped on this blog.
GSTC is discussing the possibility of staging a competition between several Clubs as a Zoom 25K Virtual Relay. Each Club would meet on their own track at the same time, with a Zoom Coordinator [ZC]. All teams would exercise appropriate social distancing and the first runner for each team would start on their 5k at the same time. Each ZC would provide ‘play-by-play’ commentary. This wrinkle should make the competition more fun for everyone! Will they be able to pull it off? If they can, I will be happy to report it in this blog!
GSTC is discussing the possibility of staging a competition between several Clubs as a Zoom 25K Virtual Relay. Each Club would meet on their own track at the same time, with a Zoom Coordinator [ZC]. All teams would exercise appropriate social distancing and the first runner for each team would start on their 5k at the same time. Each ZC would provide ‘play-by-play’ commentary. This wrinkle should make the competition more fun for everyone! Will they be able to pull it off? If they can, I will be happy to report it in this blog!
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete